<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Dimming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.longnow.org/2007/09/06/global-dimming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2007/09/06/global-dimming/</link>
	<description>The Official Weblog of The Long Now Foundation and Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:27:23 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ville</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2007/09/06/global-dimming/comment-page-1/#comment-2455</link>
		<dc:creator>Ville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 08:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2007/09/06/global-dimming/#comment-2455</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t your mom tell you not to trust random tv programs? The documentary is discussed on realclimate at http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/01/global-dimming/ (or at  http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/04/global-dimming-and-climate-models/ if you actually saw the edited US version). Summing up the detailed article a bit (or my understanding of it): the documentary in question is alarmist, exaggerates things and does not reflect the general understanding of the effect of aerosols on climate change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t your mom tell you not to trust random tv programs? The documentary is discussed on realclimate at <a href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/01/global-dimming/" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/01/global-dimming/</a> (or at  <a href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/04/global-dimming-and-climate-models/" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2006/04/global-dimming-and-climate-models/</a> if you actually saw the edited US version). Summing up the detailed article a bit (or my understanding of it): the documentary in question is alarmist, exaggerates things and does not reflect the general understanding of the effect of aerosols on climate change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
