<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decision: Blogs vs. New York Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/</link>
	<description>The Official Weblog of The Long Now Foundation and Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:58:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TopGear</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-8879</link>
		<dc:creator>TopGear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 02:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/#comment-8879</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t get this :\ can somebody pls explain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t get this :\ can somebody pls explain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News Wikis, Ann Arbor style</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-8686</link>
		<dc:creator>News Wikis, Ann Arbor style</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/#comment-8686</guid>
		<description>[...] the following: Five years ago, blogger Dave Winer and New York Times executive Martin Nisenholtz made a bet. “In a Google search of five keywords or phrases representing the top five news stories of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the following: Five years ago, blogger Dave Winer and New York Times executive Martin Nisenholtz made a bet. “In a Google search of five keywords or phrases representing the top five news stories of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog &#124; Arbor Web Solutions &#187; News Wikis, Ann Arbor style</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-7948</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog &#124; Arbor Web Solutions &#187; News Wikis, Ann Arbor style</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/#comment-7948</guid>
		<description>[...] the following: Five years ago, blogger Dave Winer and New York Times executive Martin Nisenholtz made a bet. “In a Google search of five keywords or phrases representing the top five news stories of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the following: Five years ago, blogger Dave Winer and New York Times executive Martin Nisenholtz made a bet. “In a Google search of five keywords or phrases representing the top five news stories of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O Bloody Hell</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-6960</link>
		<dc:creator>O Bloody Hell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 00:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/#comment-6960</guid>
		<description>Another option for deciding what the top stories for the time frame in question would be is the algorithm used by the excellent Newsmap to rank its top stories of the moment -- I would assume this algorithm could be applied over time, too, or varied to do so.

Newsmap: http://newsmap.jp/#</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another option for deciding what the top stories for the time frame in question would be is the algorithm used by the excellent Newsmap to rank its top stories of the moment &#8212; I would assume this algorithm could be applied over time, too, or varied to do so.</p>
<p>Newsmap: <a href="http://newsmap.jp/#" rel="nofollow">http://newsmap.jp/#</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medical Site</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-6541</link>
		<dc:creator>Medical Site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/#comment-6541</guid>
		<description>Can anyone atest to the service?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone atest to the service?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Goldman</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-6390</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/#comment-6390</guid>
		<description>This article surprised me that people would really bet that much money on such a dumb little bet. Whatever they want to d though, i guess. I wasn&#039;t shocked when i saw that the search of gas prices can up with the most combined articles. This is one of the biggest issues facing America over the past few years. Of course, the Iraq war and the Virginia Tech killings would have large search results also. I was unaware of Chinese exports being a huge issue today, but i guess i was wrong, although it was not one of the top searches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article surprised me that people would really bet that much money on such a dumb little bet. Whatever they want to d though, i guess. I wasn&#8217;t shocked when i saw that the search of gas prices can up with the most combined articles. This is one of the biggest issues facing America over the past few years. Of course, the Iraq war and the Virginia Tech killings would have large search results also. I was unaware of Chinese exports being a huge issue today, but i guess i was wrong, although it was not one of the top searches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blogs, longbets.org, and education of sociology &#124; keyongtech</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-6196</link>
		<dc:creator>blogs, longbets.org, and education of sociology &#124; keyongtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/#comment-6196</guid>
		<description>[...] the bet is resolved. See  “Decision: Blogs vs. New York Times” (2008-02-01) by Alexander Rose http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/d...ew-york-times/  I&#039;d like encourage, for many of you, who have lots of opinions on technical issues or social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the bet is resolved. See  “Decision: Blogs vs. New York Times” (2008-02-01) by Alexander Rose <a href="http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/d...ew-york-times/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/d&#8230;ew-york-times/</a>  I&#8217;d like encourage, for many of you, who have lots of opinions on technical issues or social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Rose</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-6090</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/#comment-6090</guid>
		<description>I just tried to run this test on 02008 with the same criteria.  It is basically not possible now that Google groups News and Blog posts up into categories in web searches.  It does

Top Stories of 02008 as voted by AP members:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081222/ap_on_re_us/ye_top10_stories

But if you look at the News Vs Blog groupings this is what you get, with a clear winner in the News category:
_1. U.S. ELECTION: News: 1, Blogs 11
winner News

_2. ECONOMIC MELTDOWN: News 0, Blogs 0
tie

_3. OIL PRICES: News 1, Blogs 11
winner News

_4. IRAQ: Blogs 11, News 0
winner Blogs

_5. BEIJING OLYMPICS: News 4, Blogs 0
winner News

_6. CHINESE EARTHQUAKE: News 5, Blogs 0
winner News

_7. SARAH PALIN: Blogs 10, News 0
winner Blogs

_8. MUMBAI TERRORISM: News: 1, Blogs 13
winner News

_9. HILLARY CLINTON: News: 0, Blogs 10
winner Blogs

_10. RUSSIA-GEORGIA WAR: News 0, Blogs 0
tie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just tried to run this test on 02008 with the same criteria.  It is basically not possible now that Google groups News and Blog posts up into categories in web searches.  It does</p>
<p>Top Stories of 02008 as voted by AP members:<br />
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081222/ap_on_re_us/ye_top10_stories" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081222/ap_on_re_us/ye_top10_stories</a></p>
<p>But if you look at the News Vs Blog groupings this is what you get, with a clear winner in the News category:<br />
_1. U.S. ELECTION: News: 1, Blogs 11<br />
winner News</p>
<p>_2. ECONOMIC MELTDOWN: News 0, Blogs 0<br />
tie</p>
<p>_3. OIL PRICES: News 1, Blogs 11<br />
winner News</p>
<p>_4. IRAQ: Blogs 11, News 0<br />
winner Blogs</p>
<p>_5. BEIJING OLYMPICS: News 4, Blogs 0<br />
winner News</p>
<p>_6. CHINESE EARTHQUAKE: News 5, Blogs 0<br />
winner News</p>
<p>_7. SARAH PALIN: Blogs 10, News 0<br />
winner Blogs</p>
<p>_8. MUMBAI TERRORISM: News: 1, Blogs 13<br />
winner News</p>
<p>_9. HILLARY CLINTON: News: 0, Blogs 10<br />
winner Blogs</p>
<p>_10. RUSSIA-GEORGIA WAR: News 0, Blogs 0<br />
tie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My research proposal</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-5450</link>
		<dc:creator>My research proposal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/#comment-5450</guid>
		<description>[...] years ago, blogger Dave Winer and New York Times executive Martin Nisenholtz made a bet. &#8220;In a Google search of five keywords or phrases representing the top five news stories of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] years ago, blogger Dave Winer and New York Times executive Martin Nisenholtz made a bet. &#8220;In a Google search of five keywords or phrases representing the top five news stories of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calling blogs &#8220;blogs&#8221; doesn&#8217;t demean the NY Times &#124; Out of the Box</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-3714</link>
		<dc:creator>Calling blogs &#8220;blogs&#8221; doesn&#8217;t demean the NY Times &#124; Out of the Box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/#comment-3714</guid>
		<description>[...] what the Times may be doing online or, for that matter, what CNN does on television. Indeed, the Times could be doing a lot worse than blogs in attracting some sources of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what the Times may be doing online or, for that matter, what CNN does on television. Indeed, the Times could be doing a lot worse than blogs in attracting some sources of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogs vs. New York Times &#171; Notas ao café&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-3500</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogs vs. New York Times &#171; Notas ao café&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 02:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/#comment-3500</guid>
		<description>[...] decisão chegou e Winer ganhou a aposta. Que numa pesquisa no Google, ou em qualquer outro motor de busca, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] decisão chegou e Winer ganhou a aposta. Que numa pesquisa no Google, ou em qualquer outro motor de busca, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-02-05 : James Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-3431</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-02-05 : James Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/#comment-3431</guid>
		<description>[...] Decision: Blogs vs New York Times Five years ago, daddy-blogger Dave Winer bet NYT president Martin Nisenholtz that by 2007, blogs would be more relevant sources than the Times in Google search results for the year&#8217;s top news stories. (tags: blogging journalism newspapers new+york+times) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Decision: Blogs vs New York Times Five years ago, daddy-blogger Dave Winer bet NYT president Martin Nisenholtz that by 2007, blogs would be more relevant sources than the Times in Google search results for the year&#8217;s top news stories. (tags: blogging journalism newspapers new+york+times) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-3430</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 19:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/#comment-3430</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually intrigued by how the original bet was &quot;overtaken by events&quot;. If the bet were more specific, it would have been easier to adjudicate. But at the same time, a more specific bet might have hidden many of the interesting issues:

 - The arrival of a &quot;third competitor&quot;, Wikipedia, which was never included in the original bet.
 - The continued robustness of professional, commercial content in search results.
 - The variation between different search engines.

Almost every single aspect of the original bet has been subtly affected by events. And this, in itself, is one of the most important lessons we can take away from the Long Bet project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually intrigued by how the original bet was &#8220;overtaken by events&#8221;. If the bet were more specific, it would have been easier to adjudicate. But at the same time, a more specific bet might have hidden many of the interesting issues:</p>
<p> &#8211; The arrival of a &#8220;third competitor&#8221;, Wikipedia, which was never included in the original bet.<br />
 &#8211; The continued robustness of professional, commercial content in search results.<br />
 &#8211; The variation between different search engines.</p>
<p>Almost every single aspect of the original bet has been subtly affected by events. And this, in itself, is one of the most important lessons we can take away from the Long Bet project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In a Google search of five keywords or phrases representing the top five news stories of 2007, weblogs will rank higher than the New York Times&#8217; Web site. &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-3428</link>
		<dc:creator>In a Google search of five keywords or phrases representing the top five news stories of 2007, weblogs will rank higher than the New York Times&#8217; Web site. &#124; Midas Oracle .ORG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/#comment-3428</guid>
		<description>[...] blogs won the bet. In a Google search of five keywords or phrases representing the top five news stories of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogs won the bet. In a Google search of five keywords or phrases representing the top five news stories of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Official: blogs top newspapers in Google &#124; News in brief</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/comment-page-1/#comment-3424</link>
		<dc:creator>Official: blogs top newspapers in Google &#124; News in brief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 14:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2008/02/01/decision-blogs-vs-new-york-times/#comment-3424</guid>
		<description>[...] week, The Long Now Foundation adjudicated on the result of the bet. In a Google search for AP&#8217;s top stories of 2007, blogs beat the New York Times by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week, The Long Now Foundation adjudicated on the result of the bet. In a Google search for AP&#8217;s top stories of 2007, blogs beat the New York Times by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
