<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Note to Leibnitz and Newton&#8230; Archimedes beat you both.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.longnow.org/2009/01/19/note-to-leibnitz-and-newton-archimedes-beat-you-both/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2009/01/19/note-to-leibnitz-and-newton-archimedes-beat-you-both/</link>
	<description>The Official Weblog of The Long Now Foundation and Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick Costigan</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2009/01/19/note-to-leibnitz-and-newton-archimedes-beat-you-both/comment-page-1/#comment-6346</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick Costigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2009/01/19/note-to-leibnitz-and-newton-archimedes-beat-you-both/#comment-6346</guid>
		<description>This subject was covered in detail by BBC&#039;s Horizon back in 2001. Here&#039;s the website:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2001/archimedestrans.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This subject was covered in detail by BBC&#8217;s Horizon back in 2001. Here&#8217;s the website:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2001/archimedestrans.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/horizon/2001/archimedestrans.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: URNMONEY: pounds of penance</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2009/01/19/note-to-leibnitz-and-newton-archimedes-beat-you-both/comment-page-1/#comment-6231</link>
		<dc:creator>URNMONEY: pounds of penance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2009/01/19/note-to-leibnitz-and-newton-archimedes-beat-you-both/#comment-6231</guid>
		<description>[...] Archimedes Codex.The entire text is available for free on Google Books(you might needthis). (vialong now) Tags:archimedesissacnewtongottfriedleibnizmathematicscalculusBy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Archimedes Codex.The entire text is available for free on Google Books(you might needthis). (vialong now) Tags:archimedesissacnewtongottfriedleibnizmathematicscalculusBy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science Etcetera, Moonday 20090126 &#124; ideonexus.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2009/01/19/note-to-leibnitz-and-newton-archimedes-beat-you-both/comment-page-1/#comment-6230</link>
		<dc:creator>Science Etcetera, Moonday 20090126 &#124; ideonexus.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 04:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2009/01/19/note-to-leibnitz-and-newton-archimedes-beat-you-both/#comment-6230</guid>
		<description>[...] Did Archimedes beat Newton and Leibnitz to calculus? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Did Archimedes beat Newton and Leibnitz to calculus? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TobyF</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2009/01/19/note-to-leibnitz-and-newton-archimedes-beat-you-both/comment-page-1/#comment-6212</link>
		<dc:creator>TobyF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2009/01/19/note-to-leibnitz-and-newton-archimedes-beat-you-both/#comment-6212</guid>
		<description>The critical contribution of Newton and Leibniz to the Calculus was showing the inverse relationship between differentiation and integration.  Fermat had laid out a good deal of this several decades earlier for particular cases like polynomials, but not for general functions.  Archimedes&#039; achievements were remarkable, and there&#039;s a lot we don&#039;t know about his work, but there is no evidence that he was close to this particular realization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The critical contribution of Newton and Leibniz to the Calculus was showing the inverse relationship between differentiation and integration.  Fermat had laid out a good deal of this several decades earlier for particular cases like polynomials, but not for general functions.  Archimedes&#8217; achievements were remarkable, and there&#8217;s a lot we don&#8217;t know about his work, but there is no evidence that he was close to this particular realization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver X</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2009/01/19/note-to-leibnitz-and-newton-archimedes-beat-you-both/comment-page-1/#comment-6207</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2009/01/19/note-to-leibnitz-and-newton-archimedes-beat-you-both/#comment-6207</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s important to remember that integration is only half of calculus. And inventing differentiation outside the context of Cartesian geometry and (ahem) Newtonian physics was not likely to happen. But there is no doubt that Archimedes pioneered limit theory that underlies both and much else besides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s important to remember that integration is only half of calculus. And inventing differentiation outside the context of Cartesian geometry and (ahem) Newtonian physics was not likely to happen. But there is no doubt that Archimedes pioneered limit theory that underlies both and much else besides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dang&#8230;1500 Years Wasted&#8230; &#171; Tai-Chi Policy</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2009/01/19/note-to-leibnitz-and-newton-archimedes-beat-you-both/comment-page-1/#comment-6205</link>
		<dc:creator>Dang&#8230;1500 Years Wasted&#8230; &#171; Tai-Chi Policy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2009/01/19/note-to-leibnitz-and-newton-archimedes-beat-you-both/#comment-6205</guid>
		<description>[...] Ancient Greeks, Archimedes, History, Math, Newton, Science and Technology.  trackback  It turns out Archimedes discovered some of the basic principles of calculus that had to wait until Newton and Leibnitz to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ancient Greeks, Archimedes, History, Math, Newton, Science and Technology.  trackback  It turns out Archimedes discovered some of the basic principles of calculus that had to wait until Newton and Leibnitz to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calculus and the Archimedes Palimpsest : The Computus Engine</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2009/01/19/note-to-leibnitz-and-newton-archimedes-beat-you-both/comment-page-1/#comment-6204</link>
		<dc:creator>Calculus and the Archimedes Palimpsest : The Computus Engine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2009/01/19/note-to-leibnitz-and-newton-archimedes-beat-you-both/#comment-6204</guid>
		<description>[...] via Long Now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Long Now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

