<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We have met the enemy and he is us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.longnow.org/2009/04/24/we-have-met-the-enemy-and-he-is-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2009/04/24/we-have-met-the-enemy-and-he-is-us/</link>
	<description>The Official Weblog of The Long Now Foundation and Friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 09:54:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam Penrose</title>
		<link>http://blog.longnow.org/2009/04/24/we-have-met-the-enemy-and-he-is-us/comment-page-1/#comment-6853</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Penrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.longnow.org/2009/04/24/we-have-met-the-enemy-and-he-is-us/#comment-6853</guid>
		<description>&quot;worst of all, politicians falling back on tired old partisan habits, furiously pointing fingers at anyone who dares to cross doctrinal lines in search of common solutions.&quot;

Really? Which cross-doctrinal solutions do you see to climate change? I see a Democratic Party advancing (in CA and nationally) a fairly bold set of solutions that Long Now speakers such as Saul Griffith would fault only for their timidity being rejected by 90+% of Republicans as much too bold. On health care things are a little more complicated, but the same rough sketch fits: the Democrats are advancing a specific plan informed by a broad consensus of experts, and the Republicans oppose it without offering an alternative.

The linked ideas that:
    - partisanship per se is a problem
    - many if not most good ideas tend to appeal across party divisions
are simply false, at least in my inspection of current U.S. politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;worst of all, politicians falling back on tired old partisan habits, furiously pointing fingers at anyone who dares to cross doctrinal lines in search of common solutions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Really? Which cross-doctrinal solutions do you see to climate change? I see a Democratic Party advancing (in CA and nationally) a fairly bold set of solutions that Long Now speakers such as Saul Griffith would fault only for their timidity being rejected by 90+% of Republicans as much too bold. On health care things are a little more complicated, but the same rough sketch fits: the Democrats are advancing a specific plan informed by a broad consensus of experts, and the Republicans oppose it without offering an alternative.</p>
<p>The linked ideas that:<br />
    &#8211; partisanship per se is a problem<br />
    &#8211; many if not most good ideas tend to appeal across party divisions<br />
are simply false, at least in my inspection of current U.S. politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
