The Long Now Blog


Ideas about Long-term Thinking    Blog Homepage   |   Subscribe in a reader


Monkeys to replace human linguists!

July 9th, 02009 by Tex Pasley

Cottontop Tamaran

This recent study has found that monkeys are able to discern the prefixes and suffixes of human language.  These word parts are essential to the grammars of many languages — including English, where verbs are changed by the addition of suffixes to mark things like tense, aspect, person and number (hear-d, hear-s, hear-ing, etc.).

In the study, Cottontop Tamarin monkeys (pictured on the left) were made to listen to human speakers modifying a fictitious word base “shoy”.  The monkeys would grow accustomed to hearing a phrase such as “shoy-bi,” where “bi” functions as a suffix. When the monkeys heard “bi-shoy” — turning “bi” into a prefix — they reacted by turning to the researcher playing the recording, indicating they were aware of the inconsistency in the sound pattern. What’s more, the monkeys were able to recognize the change after hearing a single phrase only a few times.

Lead Author Ansgar Endress, a researcher at Harvard University, sees a parallel in the way human babies learn the rules of affixation in a language by tracking the position of speech sounds in relation to one another. By identifying this cognitive function in other animals, he suggests that the ability to comprehend and categorize affixation, a key mechanism driving human language, may have evolved for a non-linguistic purpose.

(By the way, we here at The Rosetta Project aren’t really worried about having our jobs outsourced to other primates, since they haven’t been shown to be able to parse infixes, circumfixes, much less nonconcatenative morphology.   And they can’t type very well.  Now, being replaced by machines… this has us a little worried!)

This entry was posted on Thursday, July 9th, 2009 at 1:52 pm and is filed under Rosetta. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Monkeys to replace human linguists!”

  1. Rowland Says:

    Posted on July 9th, 2009 at 3:17 pm

    “[the monkeys] reacted by turning to the researcher playing the recording, indicating they were aware of the inconsistency in the sound pattern. ” so do i really have to go into why i have a problem with this? wait wait, my cat just turned to me, indicating she is aware that i do not.

  2. Laura Welcher Says:

    Posted on July 15th, 2009 at 2:28 pm

    I think the metric is the primate equivalent of the studies with human infants that correlate interest with eye gaze.

    Good luck with the cat study — mine completely ignore me.

  3. Jim Says:

    Posted on July 21st, 2009 at 10:12 pm

    The linguists are not likely to fear for their jobs anytime soon:

    http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1596

Leave a Comment

Some Rights Reserved (CC)

The Long Now Foundation
Fostering Long-term Responsibility
est. 01996.