Biochronicity

July 27th, 02011 by Alex Mensing

Over the course of a lifetime the human body undergoes various developments at various timescales. There are daily processes such as digestion and sleep, but also decadal processes by which infants mature into adults – undergoing puberty somewhere along the way – and gradually grow old. Biologists have fruitfully studied the mechanisms behind these daily, monthly and yearly sorts of developments, but the factors that actually determine when and how quickly they occur are much less certain.

Wired’s Danger Room featured a recently announced effort by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to investigate those temporal determinants. The Wired blog post explains the agency’s ‘Biochronicity’ project:

There’s a hidden clock that underlies every process of every living thing — from when our cells start dividing to how quickly we age. Researchers at Darpa, the Pentagon’s extreme science agency, believes they can find it, using a mash-up of biology, code-cracking, mathematics and computer science.

…to uncover the calculus within the genome, it might take some looking beyond the genome. Genes may contribute a few elements to the inner clock, but they interact within a larger scaffolding of cell processes and environmental factors. Furthermore, all those interactions may not be subject to any top-down control of a particular actor. Darpa’s “master regulator” may turn out to be more of an interlocking network of systems.

So it appears that the best way to learn about the long-term biological development of a human may be to study a plethora of individual timing mechanisms and the factors that influence them. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency hopes to use such information to predict the course of processes such as cell cycles and aging. The trick, perhaps, will be to come full circle and use knowledge of numerous, distinct yet interdependent mechanisms to paint a holistic and coherent portrait of yearly, decadal or even lifetime development. So it goes with long-term thinking in general. The big picture is composed of – and derived from – small pixels.

The success of this research could have profound implications for long-term thinking in society. Michael West, a scientist who has been studying human aging and cell mortality since the early 1990s, spoke at The Long Now Foundation’s SALT series in 02004 about “The Prospects of Human Life Extension,” pointing out that an average life-span of 100 years or more would likely change the way that people think about time and how they plan for the future. It was none too many generations ago when few humans lived beyond their forties.

Danger Room writers Noah Shachtman and Lena Groeger are excited and encouraged about the scope of the project.

Biochronicity is a return to the fundamentals, the building blocks of science. Of course, this mission to uncover how time is encoded in our biology will begin with tiny steps. But now could be the perfect time to start.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 27th, 02011 at 3:38 pm and is filed under Long Term Science.

  • http://longgame.org/ Matt Warren

    Wonderful post. I can’t wait to learn more.

  • Anonymous

    I think you missed a ’0′ in front of ’1990s’.

  • Alvina Kawaihae

    It seems the government research, electronic devices touch-capacity, as well as private sector research like the Monroe Institute all allude to some serious psychic-connection to living-matter energy understatements. Do you think the shaman will ever be freed from his bubble if time to explain to you what he sees? Do we who experience two-world timescapes get to enjoy the unraveled puzzle and accept validation through research besides psyche-labels?

  • http://www.sportsbabel.net sportsbabel

    “….pointing out that an average life-span of 100 years or more would likely
    change the way that people think about time and how they plan for the
    future. It was none too many generations ago when few humans lived
    beyond their forties.”

    Have we really changed the way we think about time and plan for the future as our average life span has gone from the forties to today’s average in the sixties (and many into eighties and nineties)?? It seems to me to be a resounding “no”.

    Then why are we so gung-ho about pushing that number into the hundreds? Is there a switch point somewhere?

    Darpa certainly doesn’t care about long-term thinking — “biochronicity” is simply the final phase of the military-industrial complex making its presence known.

  • Net102

    The DARPA Project apparently produces studies that are typically conducted over a period of a month, more or less. The Defense Department may be trying to extend their research in order to offset wage decreases brought on by DOD budget cuts. What exactly does pushing the average human life expectancy include scientifically? I suppose this involves biological intervention  for perhaps unlocking possibly a longer life span by preventing cancer or other terminal disease that is the result of aging and cellular processes. Military research and development certainly has proven to be quite successful within its scope of research and development.

  • Net102

    Very good _Skywalker.

Some Rights Reserved (CC)

The Long Now Foundation
Fostering Long-term Responsibility
est. 01996.